Billy Jack's Pow Wow Corner

Brave is concerned that referring to a certain Foundation Director as 'Cartman', that it may devalue and demean the actual cartoon character. But after reviewing writings, statements, self posted images and appearances by the Director I have decided that the reference shall stand. This was a difficult decision for this Brave as he was torn between the cartoon character and the diabolical doll in the Chucky movie franchise.

Brave also want to clarify one thing so as to not inpune the cartoon Cartman's character. The cartoon Cartman does not ask for donations like an Evangelist to support ill conceived lawsuits doomed to failure. Hope Brave has clarified that.

Hope you all agree with his decision.

Billy Jack
Patriot, Sage, Humorist

This Brave must have missed the memo but I have just seen a legal pleading where the Plaintiffs attorney has told a Federal Judge that a PI may not carry an exposed, unloaded firearm. This is rather strange as BSIS issues Exposed Firearm Cards to Licensed Security Guards and Private Investigators, allowing them to carry 'loaded' and exposed when working.

Further, BSIS requires PI's with CCW to also have the BSIS Firearm Card. Perhaps Brave misread the Plaintiffs Pleading. Just returned from Navajo Nation and other southwestern venues on vacation and may be a bit rusty in legal reading skills. I assume it is a bad thing to mislead a Federal Judge. For Plaintiff's attorneys sake, Brave hope this is not the case. Foundation's counsel better hope County Counsel not spot this misstatement and make an issue out of it. In the words of Elmer Fudd; "Ler's be veery quiet!"

Brave is still pursuing real CCW cases for individusl clients with Good Cause. Please, no Foundations!

Billy Jack
Patriot

Cartman has his finger in Federal dam. Dam about to break and flood all Foundation syncophants in its path. Time for members to sneak one of their parents checks and send donations to millionaire Foundation Director Cartman. Oh, did I let the cat out of bag about Cartman? Cartman says: 'respect my authority'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDd07jhGcL0&feature=related

There is much members are not being told but they would not understand it anyway. It just feels so good to make donations. Like Brave urinating on a forest fire, it not do much good but you can say you did something.

Billy Jack
Patriot

Brave was shooting in Brea New Years Eve to try out some new ammo from USAammo. It performed flawlessly by the way. I shall be stocking up for the 'future'. Anyway, I am showing my driver license for ID purposes while listening to two of the range employees discuss recent shooters. They were discussing how indiscreet CCW holders, remind you of anyone, like to come in and whip out their CCW's. They do not care about that, they just need to see a photo ID. Even funnier are those that whip out their 'non resident' CCW's. In that the Range is in California and the non resident CCW are just beverage coasters here makes it even more funny.

I have often posted, much to the annoyance of 'Cartman' and the Foundation syncophants that many CCW holders are so, what shall I say, overwhelmed, excited, facinated by having one that they might as well wear their weapon on a lanyard around their necks.

Please view this as an Official Billy Jack Advisory, range employees do not want to see your collection of CCW's, just a photo ID. I do not want to see you folks out there on the line firing while the range employees are laughing at you.

Got to wonder where 'Mall Ninjas' like that hang out? We try to triage them here on our site by requiring they actually read 26150 PC and their departments CCW policy prior to us assisting them. The kind of people who wear their firearms to Federal Courthouses, ask if their CCW is valid outside the county of issuance, ask if stories they have heard from friends are true that their weapons can be seized in some anti firearm counties. Can I wear my firearm at work even though it violates company written policy? Who is assisting these people?

I have to wonder where people like this hang out. Who encourages the truly 'challlenged' to apply for CCW? Who do they associate with? Who do they hire to represent them in Federal Court? Oh well, I guess these are just some of lifes other mysteries. I have a favorite George Carlin routine that I like to reflect on. It kind of sums up what I have been discussing here. I am attaching it for your edification. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rh6qqsmxNs

I have posted often about discretion but Brave has learned there are some in our society who are like audience members at a Dennis Miller or Moonie and Broon concert. They sit there and laugh so as not to appear to be uninformed but they will not 'get' the humor or point of reference until the drive home. Sad is that some will never 'get it' just as some will never understand my posts.

This has been another Billy Jack sharing moment. I now return to sub rosa CCW initiatives. What initiatives? If Brave tell you, it would be neither sub rosa nor effective.

Billy Jack
Patriot

I) Motion granted with regard to all three Plainitffs

II) Motion granted with regard to 'Foundation' Plaintiffs

III) Motion granted with regard to 'Foundation' Plaintiffs, with leave to Amend for Plaintiff Scocca

Court will issue a written decision within 30-45 days. This will provide a record should either party desire to file an appeal. 'Cartman' is beating chest and predicting victory prior to the court issuing a ruling. Billy Jack will wait patiently for a written decision. Not too late for Plaintiffs to substitute in San Jose Mercury reporter Tracy Seipel. She seems to have a true grasp of the case. This seems lacking in the 'agenda' people controlling the case. 'Cartman' needs to understand that money does not convey upon one, common sense, ethics or integrity.

'Cartman's' Foundation has been building a legal 'house of cards' for years, with companion cases depending on each other for support. Unlike the NRA, who carefully selects each case, the Foundation he heads attaches itself to any case they see that will have them as Plaintiffs. Mr. Scocca made a tactical error when he allowed the two Foundations to join his suit. It turned a simple 14th Amendment, Equal Protection case into a 'cause' case. It will make a settlement in his favor virtually impossible and has built years of additional litigation into the case. Brave was consulted about this and advised against it for the reasons previously stated. 'Cartman' and Foundation officials offered to financially support the case. That was totally unnecessary as Mr. Scocca could have self financed. The Foundations financial support is now necessary as their presense has greatly increased the cost as well as the duration of the suit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDd07jhGcL0&feature=related

I do not wish to place the blame entirely on Mr. Scocca's shoulders. He was poorly advised by people with an 'agenda'.

As in most matters of this nature, there is a tendency to beat on the messenger. Brave accepts that as a necessary byproduct of attemting to inform the public. If Brave is correct, 'house' will fall, bad law may be created and qualified applicants will be left waiting at the station.

Check back here after the court rules and I will expand on why the court ruled the way it did.

January 8, 2012. It would seem 'Cartman' can not read. Let's all settle down and wait for the courts written decision. While you are all waiting, you may want to read the 'Sierra Club Decision' on legal standing.

SIERRA CLUB v. MORTON405 U.S. 727 (1972)Decided April 19, 1972

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/sierraclub.html

It is taught in law school and it apparently applies to the two Foundations. 'Cartman' has got to stop feeding misinformation to the lower end of the 'Gene' pool. Amusing play on words but appropriate.

Billy Jack
Patriot